|
Index
1. How
Rife Broke the Vision Barrier | 2. Wavelength of
Light Limits Vision | 3. Seeing with Deep UV Light
| 4. Monochromatic Light | 5. Transverse
(Polarized) Light | 6. Diffraction Limits Vision
| 7. How Rife Overcame Diffraction | 8.
Heterodyned Light | 9. Light Frequency |
10. How to Change Light's Frequency | 11. Reply
from a Physicist | 12. Microscope Diameters |
13. Rife Scope Resolutions | 14. Smithsonian
Report: New Microscopes | 15. Resolutions Compared
to Microns/Nanometers | 16. Example Virus: Ebola
| 17. Rife microscope in action | 18. Bacterial
spore size | 19. a copy of the report | 20.
Consulting a microscope man | 21. Conclusion
| 22. Definitions | a. Incident light
| b. Resolving Power | c. Diffracted
Wave | d. Diffraction Limited | e. Magnification
| f. Micron | g. Nanometer | h.
Bacteria Size | i. Virus Size |
j. Diameters | k. Electron Microscope
| l. Color
How
Rife Broke the Vision Barrier
Gerry
Vassilatos in the book Lost
Science (1999 by Adventures
Unlimited Press) reports that Dr. R. Raymond Rife was able to
see live viruses only because he broke the "vision barrier,"
a theoretical limit imposed on optical microscopes by physicist Ernst
Abbe. Vassilatos and others state that the superior abilities
of the Rife Universal Microscope resulted from the following combination:
1. Use of monochromatic deep Ultraviolet
light (UV) rays for illumination, 2.
adjustable prisms to select different wavelengths of UV light with
which to illuminate specimens which caused them to give off light
(UV? Visible?) as vanishingly small point sources, 3.
all quartz optics and 4. heterodyning
light to achieve amplification (and conversion from UV to visual?)
If you're
lost, good! You've come to the right place. Let's learn some science!
Wavelength of Light Limits Vision
Visible light
wavelengths vary from .7 microns to .4 microns.
Since the smallest wavelength of visible light is .4 microns, the
Abbe limit says there is no use trying
to resolve (distinguish different parts of ) anything smaller than
.15 microns. ( Note that .15 microns is 150 nanometers
- the size of only the largest viruses. )
To be seen
by an ordinary light microscope, a feature must reflect (change the
direction of) the light hitting it. For any feature smaller than the
length of light waves directed at it, the light waves can "roll
right over" the feature without being changed. If this happens,
the feature is invisible. For this reason shorter wavelengths of light
have a greater probability of hitting things and of being deflected.
Seeing With Deep UV Light
According
to Lost
Science Emile Demoyens (1911) discovered "tiny mobile
specs" with his optical scope which were visible only at noon
during the months of May, June and July, when "great amounts
of deep ultraviolet light" were available. Does that claim make
sense? Not as stated. Here's why:
Ultraviolet
light (UV) is what causes sun burns. In 1932, The
International Congress on Light divided UV into three areas: UV-A
(400 to 315 nm), UV-B (315 to 280 nm) and UV-C
(280 NM and shorter *). Deep ultraviolet wavelengths are in the UV-C
range, the farthest from visible light. By definition all ultraviolet
('beyond violet') light is outside the visual spectrum. Most mammals
and the normal human eye cannot see it.
Furthermore,
and most importantly, all
solar short-wavelength UV-C radiation is absorbed and 90% of solar
UV-B radiation is absorbed by the ozone layer. Everything I've been
able to find says that "great amounts of deep ultraviolet light"
would certainly NOT be available at the Earth's surface, since even
at noon in the Summer, since 100% of UV-C is blocked. There are, however,
increased amounts of UV-A and UV-B as well as deep violet (visible)
light at these times which may have been responsible. While we can
thank Vassilatos for an inspiring book, his science terms need clarification.
When speaking of the Abbe limit he refers to "the extreme ultraviolet
light of 0.4 microns". 0.4 microns is 400 NM which is the closest
to deep violet visible light. In other words, 400 NM is actually near
UV, or extreme VIOLET light. Extreme ultraviolet would be in the UV-C
range.
Monochromatic Light?
Let's ignore
the fact that you can't see UV light for now. ( Was Rife using deep
VIOLET light which, in publications at the time of Rife's work, was
being called ultraviolet? ) Why use monochromatic light? Answer:
A light source with waves that are all same color prevents blurring
known as chromatic
aberration. This is so because different wavelengths
are deflected at slightly different angles. Put another way, the index
of refraction
of the glass in a lens is different for different wavelengths. ( See
next page.)
Transverse (Polarized) Light
Another
claim is that Rife used transverse UV light. Light emitted from most
sources is unpolarized-that is, the light waves vibrate in all directions.
A single polarizing filter will block the light not vibrating in the
polarizing direction, leaving only a transverse wave. A transverse
wave is one in which the oscillations move at 90° from the direction
of propagation of the wave.
"Polarized light microscopy (Figure 1) provides all the benefits
of brightfield microscopy and yet offers a wealth of information,
which is simply not available with any other optical microscopy technique."
- microscopyu.com
Diffraction Limits Vision
There
is still another problem with seeing very small things.
You may
recall this picture from high school physics: the angle of incidence
(the angle at which light hits a surface) will equal the angle of
reflection. When light particles hit a surface, they are reflected
at slightly different angles by the irregularities of the surface.
The differences in the scattering of light from different features
is seen as contrasting areas of light and dark which we see as detail.
In reality,
things are a little more complicated, because particles of light (
called photos ) travel linked together (we don't really understand
how) as waves.
Waves bend
behind obstacles, that is, they diffract. Diffraction
is the bending of light as light waves pass the edges of objects.
Waves also interfere. In
addition to diffraction, another property of waves is that they add
and subtract as they merge, causing interference
patterns. As close parallel light waves bend due to diffraction,
they overlap. As light waves overlap, they are simultaneously amplified
in places and cancel out in others.
An
optical microscope is said to be "diffraction limited" when
the interference patterns from reflected light of very close objects
cancel each other out so they cannot be distinguished from one another.
If you
followed to this point, you now understand of the limits of vision
far better than most people!
How Rife Overcame Diffraction
The key
was to selectively turn the specimens themselves into light sources.
For any two features closer than the diffraction limit, you can't
normally resolve them optically ... but you can cheat if you can selectively
cause only one of the features to glow! This has been done with modern
technology to obtain Far-field
fluorescence microscopy beyond the diffraction limit. To overcome
diffraction, it is claimed that Rife flooded specimens with brilliant
UV-rich light, forcing each to emit its unique absorption spectrum.
Remember,
this was done in the 1930's. Modern fluorescence
microscopes use wavelengths down to 340 nanometers (UV-A) as well
as quartz and other special glass formulations. The Rife scope, using
an optic path of solid quartz crystals (see next page) limited divergence
(separation over a distance) of light rays from the specimen to the
ocular. In other words, the quartz crystal optics kept the light rays
parallel. You'll find the same in modern scopes.
Heterodyned Light
Now it is
time to step beyond even most expert's understanding. According to
one posting: A particle much smaller than the wavelength of illumination
will deflect the path of a light wave to as much as a full 90 deg
(kingslake.) The resulting UV image could
then be heterodyned with a transverse parallel UV beam back to a light
image if desired for live observations. Rife could throw
away all light except for highly refracted photons by adjusting Rochon
prism alignments which is how he was able to see the BX virus when
it was mounted as a dilute solution. 102
Heterodyning
is common in radio transmission. 104
A wave of one frequency can be translated to a new frequency by adding
or subtracting a new wave. Would this work for UV Light? Could
invisible UV photons from the Rife apparatus be combined with additional
UV light to create new frequencies in the visual spectrum ... allowing
a peek at the world of the super small?
Light Frequency
First,
you'll need to know this... We've been talking about wavelengths of
light, but light waves also have frequencies. Frequency is the number
of times the light waves "wave" per second. These cycles
per second are known as Hertz and are abbreviated "Hz".
Visible light ranges from red: 390 trillion Hz (TerraHertz or THz)
to violet: 769 THz. (103)
UV light vibrates between 750 THz and far UV at 1.5 petaHertz (1000
- 1500 THz) and beyond to X-rays. To see UV light we might subtract
two different UV frequencies from each other to end up with a frequency
in the visual range (390 THz to 769 THz). If you could get the specimen
to emit UV at 900 THz, for example, you could see it as green (550
THz) if you could then get the specimen emitted light to subtract
from another UV beam at 1450 THz.
How to Change Light's Frequency
No, you
can't just use a filter. A blue (for example) filter blocks non-blue
wavelengths of light. It does not convert existing wavelengths (visible
or invisible) to blue wavelengths.
There are
several ways to convert UV to visible light, including fluorescent
phosphors and advanced polymers, but we are interested in this: The
idea of Heterodyning light to view the "super small". Here
is a heterodyne
optical near-field microscope. Shifting frequency in this device
is accomplished by two complex crystalline structures called acousto-optical
modulators.
"Optical
mixing: Optical beating, i.e., the mixing, i.e. , heterodyning,
of two lightwaves (incoming signal and local oscillator) in a nonlinear
device to produce a beat frequency low enough to be further processed
by conventional electronic circuitry. Note: Optical mixing is the
optical analog of heterodyne reception of radio signals. [After
FAA] Synonym optical heterodyning." - Institute
for Telecommunications Science
This
Japanese
company makes fiber optic tools and claims the "adoption
of UV- visible conversion glass".
Reply From a Physicist
According
to an email reply from a Senior Staff Physicist at a modern crystal
manufacturer: "It is possible to perform
difference frequency generation with a 900-THz (333 nm) [
that's UV ] radiation and 350-THz (857 nm) [
that's Infra-red ] radiation to produce 550-THz (545 nm) [
that's green ] difference frequency radiation.
If the 333-nm radiation is a weak fluorescence, it probably would
be better to detect it directly rather than converting to 545 nm.
The strong 857-nm radiation could be generated by a titanium:sapphire
laser tuned to that wavelength. Quartz will not work as the nonlinear
crystal because it will not phase match for the process, and it has
a small nonlinearity. A type-I barium borate (BBO) crystal (theta=34.70
degrees) could be used for the process. If this frequency conversion
is to be done continuously, conversion efficiency is going to be very
low (random counts of single photons)."
Did Rife
heterodyne UV and Infra-red
( IR ) into visible light? This is possible, but the above raises
some doubts that it could have been done as claimed, using quartz
crystals at detectable levels in real time.
Microscope Diameters
To
evaluate
claims about Rife's microscopes we should also understand the word
"diameters." DIAMETER:
The magnifying power of a lens. A lens that magnifies an object 5
times, is said to be 5 diameters, or 5X. (Read
more) Today, the optical limit is about 3,000 "diameters"
which can resolve (distinguish different parts
of) objects as small as 150 nanometers.
This has been pushed as high as 6,000 diameters, but typically 1500
X is the highest practical optical magnification. 26
| 42
Rife Scope Resolutions
Rife's
Prismatic Microscope in 1930 gave resolutions of 17,000 diameters
and his Universal Microscope of 1933 provided resolutions to 31,000
diameters, with magnifications in excess of 60,000 diameters. With
photographic enlargement, he was able to provide
300,000 diameter magnifications according
to Vassilatos
and others. 24
| 26 | 30
| 31 | 32
| 33
| 34 | 35
| 36
| 37
Smithsonian Report: New
Microscopes
The
Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution,
1944, pp 193-219, entitled "The New Microscopes" by R E Seidel and
M E Winters says:
"Working
together back in 1931 and using one of the smaller Rife microscopes
having a magnification and resolution of 17,000 diameters, Dr. Rife
and Dr.
Arthur Isaac Kendall, of the department of bacteriology of Northwestern
University Medical School, were able to observe and demonstrate the
presence of the filter-passing forms of Bacillus typhosus." 05
| 08
Resolutions Compared to
Microns / Nanometers
What
does it mean to "give a resolution of 17,000 diameters"?
What sizes could he see ... in microns or nanometers?
In
the picture of a human hair to the left we can see what 20 microns looks
like at 1000 diameters. 06
QUESTION:
If you can resolve a 20 micron (20,000 Nanometer) human hair at 1000X,
what magnification would you have to reach to resolve a 3 to 300 nanometer
virus?
ANSWER:
17,000
may or may not be enough. In
the photo below, 160,000
diameters are shown in a view of a virus. As
we saw above, the optical limit is 150 nanometers, so you SHOULD be
able to pick a good number of viruses ( which range from 3 to 300 nanometers)
out from their surroundings with a good optical scope. In other words,
seeing viruses does not necessarily mean that Rife broke the Abbe limit.
Example Virus: Ebola
The
Ebola virus ranges from 50 to 300 nanometers. 11
This picture included the magnification in the caption, but we have
no idea of the size in microns of this particular specimen.
"Electron
micrograph of Ebola Zaire virus. This is the first photo ever taken,
on 10/13/1976 by Dr. F.A. Murphy, now then at CDC. Diagnostic specimen
in cell culture at 160,000 x magnification." 10
If
Rife got up to 160,000 diameters and beyond as claimed, he would indeed
have been able to see LIVING viruses and he would have been the first
person to do so.
Are
there any surviving photo records that prove Rife was able to attain
results beyond those of a normal scope? Surprisingly, yes.
|